Title : Evaluation of different tests based on observations for external model evaluation of population analyses

نویسندگان

  • Karl Brendel
  • Emmanuelle Comets
  • Céline Laffont
چکیده

Purpose. To evaluate by simulation the statistical properties of normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE), prediction discrepancies (pd), standardized prediction errors (SPE), numerical predictive check (NPC) and decorrelated NPC (NPC dec) for the external evaluation of a population pharmacokinetic analysis, and to illustrate the use of NPDE for the evaluation of covariate models. Methods. We assume that a model M B has been built using a building dataset B, and that a separate validation dataset, V is available. Our null hypothesis H 0 is that the data in V can be described by M B. We use several methods to test this hypothesis: NPDE, pd, SPE, NPC and NPC dec. First, we evaluated by simulation the type I error under H 0 of different tests applied to the four methods. We also propose and evaluate a single global test combining normality, mean and variance tests applied to NPDE, pd and SPE. We perform tests on NPC and NPC dec , after a decorrelation. M B was a one compartment model with first order absorption (without covariate), previously developed from two phase II and one phase III studies of the antidiabetic drug, gliclazide. We simulated 500 external datasets according to the design of a phase III study. Second, we investigated the application of NPDE to covariate models. We propose two approaches: the first approach uses correlation tests or mean comparisons to test the relationship between NPDE and covariates; the second evaluates NPDE split by category for discrete covariates or quantiles for continuous covariates. We generated several validation datasets under H 0 and under alternative assumptions with a model without covariate, with one continuous covariate (weight), or one categorical covariate (sex). We calculated the powers of the different tests using simulations, where the covariates of the phase III study were used. 3 Results. The simulations under H 0 show a high type I error for the different tests applied to SPE and an increased type I error for pd. The different tests present a type I error close to 5% for for the global test appied to NPDE. We find a type I error higher than 5% for the test applied to classical NPC but this test becomes close to 5% for NPC dec. For covariate models, when model and validation dataset are consistent, type I error of the tests are close to 5% for both effects. When validation datasets and models are …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An Investigation of the Application of Different Methods of Student evaluation by clinical education groups of Birjand University of Medical Sciences

Introduction: Evaluation is an effective factor to assure the quality of education. Evaluation of clinical education assessment methods, as the most important step in educating certified physicians, is essential in order to determine the strengths and eliminate the defects. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the evaluation methods of students by clinical education groups of Birjand U...

متن کامل

Defining evaluation criteria for Health Information Systems using Human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit): systematic review

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to conduct a review of a series of published studies on evaluation of health information systems in order to determine the criteria of evaluation of hospital information systems using HOT-fit framework Information sources or data: The present study is a review study to evaluate articles of English databases PubMed, scupos and Persian databases Irandoc...

متن کامل

Evaluation of the Quality of Writing of the Title and Abstract of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Papers Published in the Journals of the Iran,s Universities of Medical Sciences in 2016, Based on the CONSORT Checklist: A Descriptive Study

Background and Objectives: Given the fact that randomized controlled clinical trials are more valid than other research methods to determine the therapeutic effects of treatment, proper design and accurate reporting is of particular importance. This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the quality of writing the title and abstract of randomized clinical trials of Iranian medical unive...

متن کامل

Evaluation of Educational Services Quality for Healthcare Services Management Students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Based on SERVQUAL Model

Introduction: Developing a system of higher education regardless of increasing the quality will bring about outcomes such as academic failure, scientific dependency, brain drain, lack of entrepreneurship and poor knowledge generation. Considering the importance of educational services quality, the aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of educational services from the viewpoints of healt...

متن کامل

Are There Any Differences in Seismic Performance Evaluation Criteria for Concrete Arch Dams?

Differences between stress-based and strain-based criteria are investigated in seismic performance evaluation of the arch dams in time domain. A numerical model of the coupled dam-reservoir-foundation system is prepared with the finite element technique. Reservoir is modeled using the Eulerian approach as a compressible domain, and the foundation rock is assumed to be massless. Dynamic equilibr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010